WATCH: New film documents threats to Tongass National Forest, need for protection

Two figures standing atop a tree stump, one pointing to the left of the frame; both looking at landscape of felled trees and, in the distance, mist-shrouded, heavily forested hillside

Tongass National Forest, Alaska

Colin Arisman

"Understory" highlights Tongass’ climate importance

One of the world’s last intact temperate rainforests is in jeopardy. Now you can spend 40 minutes on a journey through the Tongass National Forest, learning about its 800-year-old trees and the policies and people that threaten its survival. 

Watch Understory below

Understory, a limited-release documentary produced by Wild Confluence Media and sponsored by The Wilderness Society, chronicles a sailboat trip around Prince of Wales Island located within the Tongass. Elsa Sebastian, a commercial angler and Alaska panhandle native, sets out on  a “ground-truthing” expedition with Natalie Dawson, a field biologist, and Mara Menahan, a botanical illustrator, in an effort to better understand the threats to the old-growth forest.

Showcasing the majestic landscape of the Tongass, Understory chronicles an expedition to better understand the threats to the old-growth forest 

Understory not only showcases the majestic, verdant landscape of the Tongass and the abundant wildlife that live there, but the film unveils the destructive logging of old-growth trees in one of the last intact rainforests in the world.

Learn more about the film

Help get Tongass National Forest protections across the finish line
Act now

Protecting the Tongass National Forest and other forests helps tackle climate change, preserve sources of clean drinking water and shield wildlife habitat from harm. Additionally, the Tongass is the ancestral homeland and current home of numerous Indigenous Alaskans. 

Below you’ll find some facts and figures, cited in the film and elsewhere, about what makes old-growth forests like the Tongass so special and why it’s critical we protect it from wholescale logging and development.  

How much more carbon pollution forests absorb if they’re left intact

Tongass National Forest has been called our “last climate sanctuary,” a “key weapon" for fighting climate change and even the nation’s “premier climate insurance policy.” The reason: big, old-growth trees are highly effective at trapping climate-warming greenhouse gas like carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing (or “sequestering”) it—and no forest in the U.S. has more of them than the Tongass. Scientists have estimated that the Tongass accounts for about 8% of the carbon sequestered by all national forests.  

But for that to continue, the Tongass must remain intact. When old-growth trees are logged, they release  carbon back into the atmosphere, exacerbating the climate crisis rather than helping it. Research has found that carbon density in unmanaged forests is 60% higher than in managed forests. In other words, forests like the Tongass are most effective in helping the climate crisis when left standing.  

Aerial view of partially logged patches of forest

Tongass National Forest, Alaska

Colin Arisman

200 years
Amount of time it takes for new trees to recoup carbon-sequestration capacity from old, felled trees

Trees—specifically old trees—are the best technology for capturing carbon from the atmosphere and storing it. Unfortunately, once those old trees are gone, it’s not as simple as just growing a new forest.  Research has found that it can take 200 years for a regrown forest to recoup the amount of carbon lost from logging.

View from forest floor near trunk of tall tree looking directly up at tree boughs

Tongass National Forest, Alaska

Colin Arisman

Share of carbon absorbed by the largest 1% of trees

We know that the age of a forest’s trees is an important factor in how good it is at absorbing carbon pollution. But tree size matters, too; a 2018 study found that forests are unable to store large amounts of carbon without a population of large trees. The authors looked at 48 big forest plots around the world and found that the largest 1% of trees comprise 50% of live forest biomass. Since tree size is closely correlated with carbon capacity, that means the biggest, oldest trees are doing more than their fair share of carbon pollution absorption.  

Aerial view of large ship loaded with brown, stripped logs

Colin Arisman

$600 million
How much logging in the Tongass has cost taxpayers since 1999

Contrary to claims that cutting down trees in the Tongass is a boon for the economy, logging our biggest national forest has already cost  taxpayers a lot of money. In fact, the U.S. Forest Service spends far more on conducting timber sales in the Tongass than they make back, with recent data showing the federal government has lost nearly $600 million doing it since 1999. During the period studied, Tongass timber sale revenue covered just 5.4% of the cost of administering those same sales. If the wildest, yet-untouched areas of the Tongass are opened up to logging, it will likely mean more federal dollars spent on building roads—and even higher costs to taxpayers (by some estimates, road-building in the Tongass costs more than $180,000 per mile). 

20 to 1
Margin by which tourism jobs outnumber timber jobs in Southeast Alaska

Alaska’s tourism industry regularly sets new records for visitor volume and revenue. According to an economic development board focused on Southeast Alaska, tourism jobs in the region now outnumber timber jobs by a margin of about 20 to 1. Money invested in marketing Alaska as a travel destination has been money well spent; logging the Tongass would degrade the very place that people from all over the world travel to see for its natural beauty.